Not logged inAmerican Welding Society Forum
Forum AWS Website Help Search Login
Up Topic Welding Industry / Technical Discussions / CJP vs. PJP
- - By weld7320 (*) Date 06-12-2008 15:44
There seems to me to be a conflict between A2.4, 4.2.2 Complete Joint Penetration and D1.1, 3.12.1 PJP Requirements, Definition.  The question arose that when a bevel weld is called for on a joint with no depth indicated, is this a CJP or PJP?

I hope that wasn't too confusing.
Parent - By hogan (****) Date 06-12-2008 15:58
cjp per AWS A2.4 6.2.2 (07)
Omitting the depth of bevel and groove weld size dimensions from the welding symbol requires a groove weld that extends through the thickness of the joint.
Up Topic Welding Industry / Technical Discussions / CJP vs. PJP

Powered by mwForum 2.29.2 © 1999-2013 Markus Wichitill