By unclematt
Date 12-19-2008 12:59
Edited 12-20-2008 00:54
Hello vagabond;
Although I am not an 1104 guru, I have read Section 12.6.1 and I have to agree with your interpretation. It only states manufacturer or model of the bug. Although, could it be taken as the welding machine/bug is one unit? Thanks for the question. It got me to thinking early this morning. I am interested in others views on the matter. Have a good day. Matt
All of the welders I work around have two or three machines and they all seem to switch them out about once a month and never have to re-test, even when they switch from there classic III D back to there sa 200 or even there ranger 305. Unless you make money off re-testing I would let it be. Now if they switch from smaw to tig thats a different story.
By CWI555
Date 12-21-2008 14:44
Edited 12-21-2008 14:47
I believe it's the bug. Reasoning as follows:
The bug itself and it's associated gear contains positional encoders (usually hall effect version). These encoders report the position of the various moving parts to the software. If those positions are reported in error, your going to have a problem. For manual welding, its the same as changing the person as each person will have a slight to huge difference in touch. In the case of the machine, things like amount of over travel on xyz axis or reaction time, or some other peculiarity of the new machine could violate one or more of the actual welding essential variables. Think in terms of a wire feeder running way to fast or slow for the fwd travel speed of the weld-or.
If the part in question contains a positional encoder, then yes, it should be requaled. if not, it should be left alone.