The open book code examination is a demonstration of the CWI's ability to use a code. It demonstrates the inspector's ability to navigate the code to find answers to specific questions. Some customers insist that the CWI pass specific open book examinations before allowing them to work on their projects. Various DOTs have a requirement that the CWI has to pass either the D1.1 or D1.5 open book examination. They will not accept any other. That isn't to say all DOTs from all 50 states have the same requirement.

The endorsements now allows a CWI that took an open book examination using something other than that required by their customer (or employer) to take only the open book examination needed to satisfy their customer's requirements. Prior to the endorsements, the CWI had to take all three parts of the CWI examination in order to take the additional open book examination. That's what I had to do back in the early "90's".

There's a difference between using a code, i.e., looking up information, and interpreting the code when there's is a disagreement on the intent or meaning of a clause in the code. Official, i.e., binding interpretations, can only come from the appropriate code committee, not the CWI or the SCWI.

I agree with Lawrence's stance that the user of a code should have it in their hands and read all the applicable clauses, including footnotes, etc., before taking a position.

When an inspector says, "The code says XXXXXXXX." without the code in hand, I usually take the position that it doesn't say it exactly like he stated. I don't pay for many hot teas. I let the experts pay.

Best regards - Al