Not logged inAmerican Welding Society Forum
Forum AWS Website Help Search Login
Up Topic Welding Industry / Inspection & Qualification / NDT Question
- - By zzzmbrst (*) Date 06-17-2011 13:22
What are the pros and cons for performing UT on material less than 5/16 in. thick? Is Annex S is D1.1 an OK method for performing UT?
All responses will be appreciated.
Parent - By jwright650 (*****) Date 06-17-2011 13:38
With the proper written procedure you can UT less than 5/16". The procedure written by your Level III will include your acceptance/rejection criteria since D1.1 Table 6.2 limits you to 5/16" and up. Without a procedure you can still UT less than 5/16" but only for informational purposes. Also the resolution on the machine has alot to do with how well you can distinguish the intial bang from anything showing up in the first leg...my USN58L does this OK, just open the screen up to 3" or so and it seperates the signals pretty well.
Parent - - By ALEX Krist Date 06-17-2011 21:41
As you get thinner with material, if you cant get a good image with thinner material, you can push the main bang out with a Transducer that has a stand off.
Parent - By trapdoor (**) Date 06-20-2011 00:50
You would probably need a smaller probe with a higher frequency as well as a new procedure and acceptance criteria.
Parent - By dmilesdot (**) Date 06-28-2011 16:40
The main reasons for the thickness restriction in the AWS codes are the transducer frequencies and sizes required by the respective codes. ASME routinely examines thicknesses less than 5/16" but different transducers and wedges are used.  Most codes will recognize alternate methods approved by a Level III.
d
Up Topic Welding Industry / Inspection & Qualification / NDT Question

Powered by mwForum 2.29.2 © 1999-2013 Markus Wichitill