Although I cant help much, the post got my attention.
First, I was under the (quite possibly incorrect) impression chromates were under pressure to be subsitituted with alternatives having less environmental impact. I thought they were on some kind of phase-out schedule, which might be European, along with Pb and other industrial toxins. I would protect (ventilate) and be concerned with the chromium if I had no choice of alternative... the Zn is obvious but toxicity issues with Zn do not bother me nearly as much. As for this "list" it DOES exist; I am not sure whats on it.
I'm curious about what you are presently using that this new process is intended to provide economy over, and how the theoretical-based objections were determined to be invalid.
I've never known John Wright to be wrong (no pun) but I would be concerned about Zn contamination cracking & failures in an inverse proportion to the size of the weld, but in practice and real terms I have no idea how much contamination might be permissible.
In any case, the real point is heads up about the Cr, not the Zn.
Regards,
d