Kyle,
Not always~
More details need to be known to answer your question.
It's not often but if you are using the QW-290 Tempering Bead Welding, in this case, the QW-410.58 in Table QW-290.4 is an essential variable. This delete of surface temper beads requires requalification of your WPS.
Also, when toughness testing is required and the supplementary variables apply, one can not assume that he can weld as thin as the base metal can be. QW-403.6 limit the minimum base metal thickness. When base metal is too thin, less welding heat is conducted through base metal resulting in higher heat input to the joint. Parameters of WPS for thicker base metal may not guarantee the desired joint toughness when used on thin.
If no change of essential/supplementary essential variables, the answer to your question can be yes based on Section IX.
Regards,
Jovi
Actually, given your question as it is, ASME Section IX couldn't care less what you call it. What IX cares about is how you qualified it. Call it a kabooki pass. As long as the variables in the WPS are allowed by the variables in the PQR you are good to go.
Now, if a customer imposes full AWS terminological restriction then you will need to comply.