John, it sounds like in your situation, if it isn't broken, why fix it? I don't know the actual numbers right now, but i don't remember metal-cored being that much higher in deposition rates than flux-cored. At least when you compare apples to apples and run similar amperages and all that.
I guess metal cored "appears" to be cleaner but as I noted in a recent post you are still getting metal fumes, and ozone at a higher level. So when doing a comparison, is metal-cored any safer just because you can't see the contaminants that are still there? I feel good ventilation (dynamic air flow) should be a requirement for any welding and if it is provided, flux-cored shouldn't be any more dangerous than any other process.
I think many people fail to look at ALL the associated costs in changing over to other processes. Time and $ for PQRs, time to adapt, special piping and equipment, training, higher level of rework for a (hopefully) short time are all measurable costs that often are ignored when comparing deposition rates of filler metals.
I don't know about your shop, but our welders average 1 hour of trigger pulling arc time during an 8 hour shift, and that isn't slacking off. That tends to shrink the true cost advantage in changing wires. And then you have to consider the versatility as well.
Also, if your shop runs like ours, for any change you make, half the people love it, half will hate it, and many will spend their waking moments debating the issues they really can't change anyway (does that sound too cynical?). Either way, quality and production will suffer, that's a given. What the decision makers have to decide is if the change is worth it. In my book, changes have to be justified.
(Of course decisions like that are easier if the vendor will help defray the changeover costs but 100 lbs of free wire doesn't quite cut it.)
I guess I get too opinionated at times, sorry for MY rambling.
Chet Guilford