Hi Brian,
I went through this with two different fabricators. I was fortunate enough to help write the procedures, I got to follow the auditors around, and attended the exit meetings. If you haven't already, get the Quality Certification Kit from the AISC. Included in the kit is the Standard for Steel Building Structures, which in pretty much chronological order covers everything from contract documents to the delivery of the finished product. It also has the Quality Manual Guideline, which is a follow up to the Building Standard. It references each item in the Standard, and offers concepts, interpretations, tips, and quality record examples for them. Also, you will get a copy of the Quality Certification Inspection Evaluation Checklist, based on which category of certification you're applying for. This is the actual audit that will be performed by AISC personnel. On the audit, there are what are regarded as "essential" items, "critical" items, and "non-essential" items. As it states in the Category II Evaluation Checklist, every "essential" item must get a satisfactory score. All but twenty percent of the "critical" items (one if there are less than five critical items in a department) must get a satisfactory score. All but thirty percent of the items that are neither "critical" nor "essential" (three if there are less than ten such items in a department) must get a satisfactory score.
I suggest that you write your procedures based on the actual audit. You don't really need a procedure to cover every single question on the audit. You definitely need procedures to cover the "essential" items, and although you're allowed a percentage of "critical" items, I recommend procedures for them as well. I don't recommend writing procedures for everything else, but you need to make sure that you have the satisfactory percentage covered.
The first time I went through this, was in 1980. We got the kit, wrote all the procedures, did an internal audit, and hired an AISC "consultant" to come in and audit us prior to the actual audit. It was money well spent. He advised us as to whether we needed additional procedures, could do away with some of the ones we had written, etc. The thing to remember when writing your procedures, is that all you really need to do is to satisfy the audit. To me, anything beyond that is absolute overkill. I've seen a lot of AISC Procedure Manuals over the years, and I've seen unnecessary procedures, causing the fabricator to become bogged down with extra paperwork, which in addition causes extra and unnecessary physical work as well. Remember too that anything you write into law has to be followed to the letter, and that it is highly critical to tightly intertwine each related procedure. It is also critical that you leave clean, and totally accurate paper trails. The auditors seem to have a knack for finding these obscure little things that sometimes ordinarily fall through the cracks, and they are able to trace them back to another procedure that hasn't been tied together.
Good luck to you on your certification.
sw,
Just a note of clarification here. Category I, II, & III were replaced some time ago with Simple and Complex Buildings, and Simple and Major Bridges, with Fracture Critical and Sophisticated Paint Endorsement available.
The Building portion of the program has changed a lot with a new Building "Standard" and there are no more checklists. Simple and Major Bridge still use checklists but will soon will follow the Standard. I had heard that "beta" testing starts in 2005.
Now, the fabricator must develop the mandatory procedures (which they did before) but must address ALL of the "Elements" in the Standard. The auditors are VERY familiar with the new criteria and looks for evidence of compliance.
I can't tell you whether the site audit is easier or not until after July 10 when we wrap up our audit. But I can tell you that there is a lot more attention to detail required for written procedures, having gone through the document review.
From what I have seen of consultants, I have to say check their references first. But you are right in that AISC has a lot of information available the will make the process easier.
And you are right in advising not to put in too much. If you write more, you get audited on more. But be sure to at least cover the minimums or else QMC (Quality Management Co.- auditing agency) will let you know where you fall short.
Chet Guilford
Chet/Mark31,
I apologize for the confusion. I just grabbed what was in my AISC Quality Certification file, which contained the 1998 checklist, and started citing reference materials. My current company is not quality certified, so I wasn't aware of the changes. I want our facility to be certified. Our shop is pretty much doing everything we should be doing, and I believe that we wouldn't have any problems, but the office can't seem to get their part under control. They can't even get a drawing transmittal filled out properly. Thanks for the information.
http://www.aisc.org
You will have to click on the Certification link and then on the new Standard link. (for some reason the short cut didn't work correctly)
Scott,
Here is a link to all the hoopla Chet and I have been rambling about.
Interesting reading. I'll leave it at that. I had gotten used to, and had worked the bugs out of the old system, and now I have to grudgenly change over to something new.
John Wright