I'll take a shot.
A couple of things stand out to me in reading 5.22.3.1. The first is that the owner and fabricator must agree on any exceptions; so having welds closer than one pipe diameter could be acceptable in cases where there is agreement. (That assumes a discussion between owner and fabricator takes place first.)
The second item I am not sure about. The 1st sentence says "...parts to be joined by a girth weld...". I am unclear about the actual pipe to pipe joint you are talking about, but I would think that a branch fish-mouth or miter-cut would not be considered a girth weld. (I don't have A3.0 handy)
If you are simply splicing pipes to form a straight leg, then I think the joint is a girth weld and 5.22.3.1 would apply.
Chet Guilford
Either way, it is important to discuss
By -
Date 08-09-2005 22:02
You state that "Contractor states that these conditions are applicable for fabrication of Pipe only and not for Heavy Structural Fabrication like offshore platform / Jacket."
The title of API 2B is "Specification for the Fabrication of Structural Steel Pipe". If I read correctly what you say is your contractor's position, they are incorrect. Pipe fabbed to API 2B is indeed pipe, and most of the time that pipe is used in the construction of offshore platforms of various types, including jackets. The requirements of paragraph 5.5 of 2B would be applicable, however, in all cases where 2B is specified, unless as Chet said in his posting, something else has been formally agreed to between the owner and the fabricator.
Keep in mind also Chet's other point. If when the contractor assembled this spool with another spool it was a butt joint, then it would be a girth weld and in violation of paragraph 5.5. On the other hand, if it was a TKY, then it is not a girth weld and that requirement of 5.5 was satisfied.
Mankenberg