30 Inspection Trends / October 2011 Technology Notes Errata AWS D17.1 and D17.2 Aerospace Welding Specifications Errata — AWS D17.1/D17.1M:2010 Specification for Fusion Welding for Aerospace Applications The following errata have been identified and will be incorporated into the next reprinting of this document. Page 9 — Figure 5.1, S.S. No. — Remove “S.S. No.” from the top of the suggested test record form. Page 18 — Figure 5.7, Note — Correct “Suggested dimension” to “Where member differ in thickness more than 10% of the thicker member, the cap sheet shall be the thicker member” Page 18 — Figure 5.7, Footnote a — Correct “Where member differ in thickness more than 10% of the thicker member, the cap sheet shall be the thicker member” to “Suggested dimension” Page 22 — 5.4.2 Procedure Qualification, Numbering sequence — Correct “(8) filler metal used” to “(9) filler metal used”, “(9) joint design” to “(10) joint design”, “(10) electrical characteristics” to “(11) electrical characteristics”, “(11) preheat requirements” to “(12) preheat requirements”, “(12) postweld heat requirements” to “(13) postweld heat requirements”, and “(13) other variables required by the Engineering Authority” to “(14) other variables required by the Engineering Authority” Page 34 — Table 7.1, Mismatch Between Members after Welding — Correct “Refer to Paragraph 6.14.4 & Figure 6.2 Includes A, B & C Class of Welds” to “Refer to Paragraph 7.5.2.1 & Figure 7.2 Includes A, B, & C Class of Welds” Page 36 — Figure 7.1, WIDTH OF WELD FACE OR INDIVIDUAL SURFACE BEAD, W— Correct “W > 5⁄16 in TO W < 1 in 25 mm” to “W > 5⁄16 in 8 mm TO W < 1 in 25 mm” Page 36 — Figure 7.1, Footnote a — Correct “a Refer to 4.3.8.2” to “a Refer to 5.3.8.2” Page 37 — Figure 7.2, Extra horizontal line within table — Remove horizontal line between “OFW, SMAW, GTAW, GMAW” and “PAW, VP-PAW, FCAW, SAW” Page 49 — Figure A.1(d), Missing horizontal line within table — Add horizontal line between “PAWa” and “GMAW FCAW SAW” Page 58 — Table A.1, Comparable Fillet Weld Size for Same Strength (in mm) — Correct “1.23 21.2” to “1.23 31.2” Page 65 — Table C.3, Missing line within table — Add vertical line between “T1” and “W”, “Max.” and “Min.”, and “6” and “7” Page 82 — G4.14 Welding and Weldments — Correct “Figure 6.2 dictates maximum mismatch at the completed weld joint.” to “Figure 7.2 dictates maximum mismatch at the completed weld joint.” Errata: AWS D17.2/D17.2M:2007 Specification for Resistance Welding for Aerospace Applications The following erratum has been identified and will be incorporated into the next reprinting of this document. Page 14, Figure 7, annulus width — Correct “0.15 Sm” to “0.15 Rm” Errata: D1.5M, Bridge Welding Code Standard: AASHTO/AWS D1.5M/D1.5: 2010, Bridge Welding Code The following erratum has been identified and will be incorporated into the next reprinting of this document. Page 82, Table 4.1 (Continued), Matching Filler Metal Requirements for WPSs Qualified in Conformance with 5.12. Correct “ER90C-XXX” to read “E90C-XXX” in the Welding Processes and Electrode Specification Classifications column. This is the fifth entry from the bottom of the column. Official Interpretation D1.1, Structural Welding Code — Steel Subject: Qualifying two welders on one joint for pipe Code Edition: D1.1:2006 Code Provision: 4.30.3.1 and 4.19.1.1 AWS Log: D1.1-06-I20 Inquiry: Based on 4.30.3.1, is it allowed to qualify two welders on the same joint, each of them welding half pipe circumference, from top center to bottom center (either uphill or downhill progression)? Response: No.
Inspection Trends - October 2011 - Fall
To see the actual publication please follow the link above