Not logged inAmerican Welding Society Forum
Forum AWS Website Help Search Login
Up Topic Welding Industry / Technical Discussions / Differnece between HY form 80 steel and ASTM A656 gr80 steel
- - By Kix (****) Date 06-03-2008 12:35
I've been trying to research both and can't really find any good info on yields, tensiles, formability, or any good stuff.  Any pointers or good sites would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Ray C.
Parent - - By Stephan (***) Date 06-03-2008 13:04
Hi Ray,

as far as I could find out the ASTM 656 M Grade 80 (550) might be comparable with our (European) S550MC (specified within Euronorm DIN EN 10149-2).

Hence, please find as for the very first view some information hereinafter:

http://www.salzgitter-flachstahl.de/en/Produkte/warmgewalzte_produkte/stahlsorten/Hoeherfeste_Staehle_zum_Kaltumformen_thermomechanisch_gewalzt

My best regards and I hope it helps a bit,
Stephan
Parent - - By Kix (****) Date 06-03-2008 13:44
   I would agree that your 550mc is very comparable to ASTM's A656 GR 80.  This site explains a lot about this type of steel.  Good find!!  Is HY-80 pretty much the same thing as ASTM's A656 gr80, but cooked to a slighty different specification then ASTM?  I noticed HY-80 is widely used for military applications.  I'm guessiing that HY-80 is just held to a better quality standard then A656 gr 80, if you want to call it that. 
Parent - - By Stephan (***) Date 06-03-2008 20:07
Hi Ray,

very good hints coming from Phil.

I guess this material appears to be somewhat very special and as I guess due to it's being patented it makes it probably as hard to get free information on its workability - except some very general information.

However, in terms of its mechanical properties it appears quite comparable with another High Strength Low Alloy Steel (~550 MPa Yield Strength), e.g. ASTM 656 M Grade 80. At least in my humble understanding.

And it seems that this material is being used very often in naval applications, just as you supposed.

Unfortunately I haven't found any comparable material grade within the European Standards.

The only things I have found additionally were:

http://www.steelforge.com/alloys/?alloy=HY80

http://www.key-to-steel.com/default.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&NM=85

Perhaps this tops the issue a bit off.

Best regards,
Stephan
Parent - - By Kix (****) Date 06-04-2008 12:28
Thanks everybody!  Those links were all very good reading material.
Parent - - By Stephan (***) Date 06-04-2008 14:01
Ray,

sorry for having only a second for the forum.

Having found some special information from the "Germanischer Lloyd - Rules for Classification and Construction (Special Materials for Naval Ships)" perhaps being interesting for you.

Please let me coming back with this a bit later and as soon as I can*.

Best regards,
Stephan

*As far as it is even being wanted that I as a foreigner will partake on the forum! When I had a very short look upon the "P91/P92.." topic, I am honestly a bit ashamed!
Parent - - By Kix (****) Date 06-04-2008 14:19
No worries Stephan and there is nothing to be ashamed of.  We're all here for fun and to help each other out with what we can, ya know.
Parent - - By Stephan (***) Date 06-05-2008 10:05
Hi Ray,

please let me coming back on your interesting topic in terms of HY 80.

Since it appears that the major use of HY 80 can be seen in maritime applications, I have spoken meanwhile with a good colleague of mine who is mainly responsible for welding in shipbuilding and offshore.

He again had some very interesting knowledge of this apparently "mysterious" material and he could recommend me some interesting literature to study further, even the specifications of the "Germanischer Lloyd" (see also http://www.gl-group.com/start.htm) who is as I suppose surely one of the most important institutions in shipbuilding and maritime construction (perhaps even comparable with the ASME??).

And thus I had a look into the:

"Germanischer Lloyd - Rules for Classification and Construction / Materials and Welding / Metallic Materials / Special Materials for Naval Ships"

But before continuing with the technical facts I could find out by studying the literature above, please let me come first to what my colleague has told my on this material.

He told me that HY 80 as well as HY 100 (~700 MPa yield strength) is - as Phil Thomas and Henry "ssbn 727" have pointed out already (Henry!! Great photos!!) - very often used for building submarines or the hulls of submarines, respectively. As I questioned the comparability between the ASTM 656 Grade 80 and HY 80, since they appear to have similar yield strengths, he confirmed this as being the truth but... as he told me, the HY 80 does have higher notched impact strength for even lower temperatures. This again makes this steel so excellently suitable for even e.g. submarines which are being used under most different conditions (warmer Pacific waters as well as colder Atlantic waters) and severe surrounding circumstances (very high pressures). As well the corrosion resistance - so far as my colleague told me - may be an issue the HY 80 can meet in a better way compared with the ASTM 656 Grade 80. In terms of welding he has informed me, that - even under considering the technical requirements as being valid for quenched and tempered High Strength Low Alloy Steels - the HY 80 is a normally excellently weldable material. An interesting detail he could give me on the usage on the consumables. Normally Flux Cored Wires were mainly used to joining the often large wall thickness plates. Meanwhile whereas, in particular in the United Kingdom, the HY 80 is being processed more and more by using solid wires of particular composition which - as been found out - had a better behavior in regard to the peculiarity of the coarsened grain zone (narrower width) as well the weld metal deposits grain size seemed to be influenced positively. However, the latter under reserve and to my best knowledge which I have received by my experienced colleague. So if anybody of you fellows have different information in regard to the welding filler materials, used to join larger wall thicknessed HY 80, any kind of correction is - as always -greatly appreciated!

So far, please let me now continue with the technical information about HY 80, as the "Germanischer Lloyd" does see and treat this interesting material.

1.  The script as mentioned above contains the scope of hot-rolled pressure vessel and special steel grades with wall thicknesses lower or equal to 150 mm (~6 inch). The scope contains hereby the steel grades HY 80 (Germanischer Lloyd designation GL M-550), HY 100 (Germanischer Lloyd designation GL M-700) and HY 130 (Germanischer Lloyd designation GL M-900). As one can see by having a look upon the GL designations, the steels are described by using their yield strength (0.2 yield). Thus the HY 80 has a yield strength of ~550 MPa, the HY 100 has a yield strength of ~ 700 MPa and the HY 130 has a yield strength of ~ 900 MPa.

2.  The HY 80 has the German alloy designation 15 NiCrMo 10-6 as well, which shows that it is a Nickel Chromium Molybdenum Steel having a mean Carbon content of 0.15%. I have prepared a table, please see also the attached HY_80_Analysis.pdf, which shows the chemical composition of both HY 80 as the higher alloyed HY 100 quenched and tempered base material.

3.  HY 80 is required to be produced by using the steel making methods either AOD (Argon Oxygen Decarburization, see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argon_Oxygen_Decarburization), or VOD (Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization, see also http://www.energysolutionscenter.org/HeatTreat/MetalsAdvisor/iron_and_steel/process_descriptions/raw_metals_preparation/steelmaking/ladle_metallurgy/ladle_metallurgy_equipment.htm, or VODC (Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization Converter, see also http://www.metsofoundries.com/foundries/MFsteel.nsf/WebWID/WTB-040818-2256E-063B3/$File/Vaculok_Steels.pdf).

4.  Interesting is what The Germanischer Lloyd does describe on the "assessment on weldability" (Beurteilung der Schweißeignung). Since the base material has a more or less cold cracking susceptibility - as to be observed rather often in this group of steels - the Germanischer Lloyd assesses the weldability by using the following Carbon Equivalent formula:

Pcm = C + Si/30 + Mn/20 + Cu/20 + Ni/60 + Cr/20 + Mo/15 + V/10 + 5B [%]

5.  Basis for the calculation above is the steel's melt analysis. The maximum "Pcm" value however has to be agreed between the manufacturer and the classification society, in even this particular case - the Germanischer Lloyd.

6.  The steel must be delivered in an annealed condition

7.  The minimum annealing temperatures for HY 80 are:

650 °C (1202 °F) for a wall thickness lower or equal to 60 mm (~ 2.4 inch) and
635 °C (1175 °F) for a wall thickness higher 60 mm and lower or equal to 150 mm.

8.  The mechanical properties of the HY 80 are:

-  0.2 Yield Strength: 550 - 690 MPa (~ 79.8 KSI - ~ 100 KSI)
-  Yield-Tensile Ratio: 0.9 for plates (0.92 for bars and profiles)
-  Tensile Strength: 650 MPa (~ 94.3 KSI)
-  Elongation at break: 19%
-  Longitudinal CV Notch Impact Toughness at -85°C (-121 °F): Not tested
-  Transversal CV Notch Impact Toughness at -85°C (-121 °F): 50 Joule

Well Ray, as you can see, the material you have chosen to have a look upon is a very interesting one both from the metallurgical as well as from the processing point of view. And your assumption that it is just approximately similar with the ASTM 656 Grade 80 High Strength Low Alloy Structural Steel was right, at least as far as I could find out.

So finally once again a personal "Thanks" for initiating this interesting topic and thus to drive me for busying myself a little more intensive with this material. I guess I have learned again somewhat new and I hope the descriptions above may have been a little help for YOU - since this was the very first goal at all!

My very best regards,
Stephan

P.S. Thanks for your doubtless statement in terms of my participation in the forum!! A great thanks to John (jrw159) as well! What a privilege to have you fellas aside!
Attachment: HY_80_Analysis.pdf (12k)
Parent - - By Kix (****) Date 06-05-2008 15:44
Oh man, that was good reading Stephan.  Well, I feel it safe to say that this thread contains just about all anyone would want to know about HY-80 and it's many applications.  When you google HY-80 this information will be available for the whole world to see.
     Stephan, my hats off to you once again for taking the time to help me and everyone else on their jurny to seek as much knowledge about what makes this world go round.  Speaking of round.

  See ya round like a doughnut,
Ray C.

P.S.  a little Texas lingo for ya.;-)
Parent - By Stephan (***) Date 06-05-2008 19:20
Ray!

Man you make me blushing with shame right up to my ears!!

Thank you so much...

You know and I swear by God, it is always my greatest pleasure!

And... thank you for teaching me Texas lingo! What a honor!! :-):-):-)

Thanks and my best regards!
Stephan
Parent - - By DaveBoyer (*****) Date 06-06-2008 04:06
Stephan, the USA counterpart to "Germanischer Lloyd" is the ABS - American Bureau of Shipping, not to be confused with antilock braking system used on cars :-) Just in case You wanted to see if they treat things any differently.
Parent - By Stephan (***) Date 06-06-2008 15:41
Dave,

thanks a lot for this hint!

Only by having a very short look upon the ABS Website I mean that the "Germanischer Lloyd" can rather be seen as a "little relative" of the ABS.

What an institution... enormous!

Best regards,
Stephan
Parent - - By jrw159 (*****) Date 06-04-2008 15:55
Stephan,
Sir, Please do not be ashamed for someone elses actions and lack of respect.

You, my good friend, are one in a million. :-)

John
Parent - - By Kix (****) Date 06-04-2008 18:45
Who's havin bad actions and dishin out lack of respect to our man Stephan?  I'm sure we can get their panties out of a wad for them quicker than a chics dress comes off on prom night..
Parent - By jrw159 (*****) Date 06-04-2008 20:13
Nobody messin with him. Someone takin shots at the USA and Stephan did not appear to like it any more than I did. I could not hold my tongue, or fingers, and fired one across the bow as a warning shot as did another member. :-)

jrw159
Parent - - By Stephan (***) Date 06-03-2008 13:11
Hi Ray,

found somewhat more information on your interesting topic:

http://www.thyssenkrupp-steel.com/documents/1215/pas_verarb_de_en_2007.pdf

Best regards,
Stephan
Attachment: hot_rolled_hsla.pdf (67k)
Attachment: Welding_HR_02.2007_EN.pdf (494k)
Parent - By Kix (****) Date 06-03-2008 13:45
I couldn't get the PDF's to open.  My browser timed out on me.lol 
Parent - - By PhilThomas (**) Date 06-03-2008 14:50
Ray - do a search for MIL-S-16216 - that will get you to the HY-80 information.
Parent - - By Kix (****) Date 06-03-2008 15:18
This is the only really good thing I could find and it had no mechanical data or chemical comp.  http://www.suppliersonline.com/propertypages/HY80.asp
Parent - - By ssbn727 (*****) Date 06-03-2008 23:50 Edited 06-03-2008 23:58
Here are some of the naval applications for HY-80 & HY-100:
I personally welded many, many linear feet (possibly more than a mile but who was counting - not Me!!!) of this material when I welded @ EB up in good old "Rotten Groton, CT" many, many moons ago!!! :) :) :)

Take a look at some of the attached pics...

Respectfully,
Henry
Parent - - By PhilThomas (**) Date 06-04-2008 02:42
A very familiar sight!  :)

I helped build em too...both subs AND targets....at Newport News (or whatever they call it now lol)

Phil
Parent - - By ssbn727 (*****) Date 06-04-2008 03:43
I hear ya Phil!!!

The only "targets" we ever built were some LNG Tankers, and those are considered some really BIG FLOATING BOMBS!!! BBBBOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!

Just the pressure wave afterwards coming from the explosion from one of those monsters would cause some tremendous underwater turbulence if one was too close after launching a shot at... EB just happens to build them better because after all, I never heard of an Ohio class sub built from the ground up anywhere else except for England, and they ran into so many problems with their versions because, of all of the design changes they implemented, resulting in the completion of less "Boomers" than originally planned.

I am impressed at the work that was completed on the SSGN conversions for the Tridents at various shipyards that were first originally built in good old "Rotton Groton, CT!!!!" ;) ;) ;)

The Virginia class boats they built in Newport News (I believe they are called Northrop Grumman of Newport News?) were of excellent quality but, I believe the hull sections were built @ EB's Quonset Point facility, and then eventually barged down to Norfolk, VA for final assembly, and ultimately producing the most advanced attack submarines anywhere in the world!!! Thank God those targets you helped build are on our side, so we don't have to sink them because even if they weren't ours, they would be very, very hard to sink just the same!!! ;) ;) ;)

Respectfully,
Henry

Parent - - By Kix (****) Date 06-04-2008 12:14
While researching the HY-80 I found some of those naval sites and did some reading on those subs.  Why can those red subs dive to 4000 feet and we can only go to like 1500 feet or something like that.  I think that soviet sub was made out of Titanium.
Parent - - By ssbn727 (*****) Date 06-05-2008 15:05 Edited 06-06-2008 16:00
Hi Ray!

You're close in as far as the depth the former Soviet Navy led most folks to believe... The deepest depth reported on those "Alpha" class attack submarines were actually around 3000+ feet and yes, they were made out of Titanium... They were also very, very fast, and horrendously NOISY!!! ;) Consequently, not many were built.

A whole bunch of valuable data was gained from both the Soviet designers, and their western counterparts here in the USA as a result of this mostly "experimental" class of attack submarine. 

Now as far as how deep our "boats" can go is another story completely!!! First of all, the USN has had a long standing policy of only giving very, very, very conservative details of their submarines, if they released any info at all!!! So that figure of 1500 feet is very, very, very CONSERVATIVE!!! If you get my meaning - then there's not a chance in hell unless, you become a very crucial part of one of the "Blue" or "Gold" crews of one of our "boats" that I or anyone else who probably knows their actual depth limit - will be willing to tell you the actual figure!!! It's just NOT going to happen, and forgive me for being so blunt about it!!!

Just remember this... Our "boats" are also very, very fast!!! Dive very, very deep!!!

They're also very, very, very QUIET! ;) The Soviet subs were NOT!!! ;) Currently however, things may have changed to some degree yet, we're still "The Silent Service" and, they never were even close to being one! :) :) :)

Below are some pictures of some former Soviet subs. However, the Typhoon class missile sub doesn't dive as deep nor is it as fast as they want us to believe. ;) ;) ;)

Respectfully,
Henry
Parent - - By Kix (****) Date 06-05-2008 15:17
That's neat stuff Henry.  Thanks for sharing!
Parent - - By Stephan (***) Date 06-06-2008 18:50
Good heavens Henry!

You are truly the measure of all things!

What a tremendous plenty of information!

Best regards,
Stephan
Parent - - By ssbn727 (*****) Date 06-09-2008 20:18 Edited 06-09-2008 21:45
Here's some more links to some articles, publications, application stories, etc. on High Yield (HY) Steels:

http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/isijinternational/46/5/754/_pdf

http://www.ims-uk.com/ims/ims_uk/cmscatalog.nsf/Cat2ByDesc13?OpenForm&Category=ims_uk-EN-prod_techsheets&P1=YES

http://211.68.23.76/webmedia/jingpin/ifwt2006/ifwtpdf/18.pdf

http://www.jfe-steel.co.jp/en/release/2008/080130.html

http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/phase-trans/2006/coalesce.Keehan.Trends.2005.pdf

http://202.120.57.205/cdbook/isope2001/pdffiles/papers/375.pdf

http://www.journalarchive.jst.go.jp/jnlpdf.php?cdjournal=isijinternational1966&cdvol=22&noissue=12&startpage=967&lang=en&from=jnlabstract

http://www.key-to-steel.com/default.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&NM=66

http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/Research/ord0612.pdf

http://www.rsc.org/ej/CP/1999/a901369e.pdf

http://eagar.mit.edu/EagarPapers/Eagar077.pdf

http://www.virginia.edu/ms/faculty/gangloffASTM_CH_26.pdf

http://standards.gsfc.nasa.gov/reviews/iso-cd-16455-2/iso-cd-16455-2.pdf

http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/industry/SME/2004-Training/M&P/10b_Stress-corrosion%20.pdf

http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/industry/SME/2004-Training/M&P/Annex2_ECSS_Q_70_36A.pdf

https://cindasdata.com/Applications/ASMDDEMO/App/PDF/Ultra-High%20Strength%20And%20Age%20Hardening%20Steels.pdf

http://www.islandone.org/MMSG/aasm/AASM5F.html

http://www.key-to-steel.com/default.aspx?ID=CheckArticle&NM=85

http://www.ca.sandia.gov/matlsTechRef/chapters/1212TechRef_FeNiCrMo_T.pdf

http://www.sname.org/committees/design/SD-5/ABS%20High%20Speed%20Rules/Part%202-Navy.pdf

http://www.engineering.sdsu.edu/~olevsky/mse03.pdf

http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1865&context=lbnl

http://www.weldreality.com/HYSteels.htm

An interesting new design in mechanized welding apparatus:

http://www.aws.org/w/s/wj/2003/07/032/

Well, that's all for now!!! ;) I might add some more later when I have more time - which I don't have at the moment so, enjoy the readings!!! :) :) :)

Rspectfully,
Henry
Parent - - By Geese_howard (*) Date 06-23-2008 05:08
Im sorry if the next information is already given in the links published before, but i think it might get useful for you.
This is information from official documents concerning HY80 steel, but it might be outdated regarding the version.

- Chemical composition and heat treatment

                                     Thickness, (milimeters)
                            To 32 mm inclusive  Over 32 mm to 76 milimeters        Over 76 milimeters
Carbon                                  0,12-0,18                         0,13-0,18                         0,13-0.18
Manganese                            0,10-0,40                         0,10-0,40                          0,10-0,4
Phosphorous                         0,015 max                          0,015 max                          0,015 max
Sulfur                                    0,008 max                          0,008 max                          0,008 max
Silicon                                   0,15-0,38                          0,15-0,38                           0,15-0,38
Nickel                                     2,00-3,25                            2,5-3,5                              3- 3,5
Chromium                                1,00-1,80                          1,40-1,80                          1,50 - 1,90
Molybdenum                           0,2-0,6                           0,35-0,60                            0,5-0,65
Vanadium                                 0,03 max                            0,03 max                            0,03 max
Titanium                                   0,02 max                           0,02 max                             0,02 max
Copper                                     0,25 max                            0,25 max                            0,25 max
Antimony                                  0,025 max                           0,025 max                     0,025 max
Arsenic                                    0,025 max                           0,025 max                  0,025 max
Tin                                         0,03 max                            0,025 max                 0,025 max

As you can see, comp. is quite different from ASTM A656 gr.80. HY-80 is somehow similar to ASTM A372 regarding chemical composition
but the original MIL SPEC is much more complete regarding several other process requirements. HY80 is a structural quenched and tempered
steel that is "meant to be welded" (just watch for the impurities limits in the table above, limiting the risk of hot cracking, temper embritltlement
or stress relief cracking), and more over, meant to be welded with little preheat and no PWHT. (more info on that below).
The heat treatment for delivery condition of plates is quenched and tempered at 635°C for plates over 63 mm and 650°C for plates under that.
Also there is a requeriment for stress relief temperature, either in case of hot forming operations after Q&T or , at request of the buyer
a simulated stress relief before testings. In the MIL SPEC there is also requirements for heat treatmente equipment and recording.

- Mechanical properties

                                                                    Nominal thickness of the plate
                                                               19 milimeters and under  Over 19 mm
Minimum Tensile Strength                            Optional Specification, recorded as information only 
Minimum Yield Strength 0,2%                            552 - 690 MPa              552 - 686 MPa
Minimum elongation in 2 inches                                  19%                              20%
Minimum reduction in area, round tensile specimen      Not Specified                    50%

Toughness
13 - 152 mm : 81J@-84°C
152-230 mm : 47J@-18°C
16-203 mm : 610J@-40°C (measured by dynamic tear testing ASTM E609)

Charpy testing is required between 13 a 16 mm. Dynamic tear between 16 and 102 mm. Either between 102 and 203.

- Procedures of heating before and after welding (time duration, temperatures)

   Recommended preheat and interpass temperatures for HY80 hull structures welding is as follow
                                                            Min preheat     Max preheat and interpass
Thickness over 2-3/4"                                  200°F                       300°F
Thickness between 1-1/8" and 2-3/4"              150°F                      300°F   
Thickness under 1-1/8"                                 125°F                      300°F

When using E11018-M,  E10018-M or ER100S-1 filler for welding the first 3/16" of and HY80-HY80 joint of thickness between 1-1/8" and 2-3/4" , the min preheat should be 200°F, for the final weld the minimum preheat temperature can be lowered to 150°F

Preheat can be applied by means of resistence heaters, electrical induction, radiant and infrared heaters and oxyfuel gas torch, the later only recommended in case of small structures or restricted space welding, tack welding, and as auxiliary method for electrical heating.  Time for heating should be the necessary to ensure temperature gradients under 100°F in the preheat zone and uniform soaking to the desired temperature. Cooling should be under shielding and protection from wind and inclement weather.

Heat input must be controlled to a maximum of 55000 J/inch (this is a point in what welders must be severely controlled and instructed)

No requirements exists for post weld soaking (for hydrogen removal) or post weld heat treatment of HY80 joints, but is advisable a post weld soaking of 1hr per inch of thickness at temperatures between 250 and 300°F as a mean of hydrogen removal from the weld. (that is from personal experience, also in restrained
joints, the minimum preheat temperatures listed can be too low, 50°F increase form the minimum listed in that cases should be enough)

  Procedures for joint preparation
Bevels should be preparared by means of manual grinding. Double beveled joints are employed in joining hull plates, typically 60° Double bevel, 3-4 mm root opening 0-2 mm root face.

Other requeriments for welding ship structures can be found in NAVSEA T9074-AD-GIB-010/1688 "Requeriments for fabrication welding and inspection of submarine structure", and qualification of personnel and procedures in NAVSEA S9074-AQ-GIB-010/248, "Requirements for welding and brazing procedure and performance qualification". There is some other considerations for preheat and interpass temperatures when dealing with dissimilar welds between HY-80 and
austenitic metals, and when welding "less critical" joints. Also, there is important considerations regarding preheat maintenance in interrupted welding works, that i found to be critical (learned in the hard way :s).

There is some other considerations regarding inspections, documentation, repair extents and methods, and dimensional tolerances of plates in MIL-S-16216K.
If u can get that document (supossely is approved for public release and free distribution), u can do a more in-depth comparison with ASTM standards cited before. There is also official documentation from other countries regarding this steel, by example british DEFSTAN (NES) 770.

Hope this might be useful for you.

Regards.
Parent - - By ssbn727 (*****) Date 06-23-2008 19:59
Good information there Geese!

However, the info doesn't mention anything on how to control the potential for tempering embrittlement...

When we (meaning the welders @ General Dynamics/Electric Boat Division which built most of the submarines made with HY-80 or 100) welded either the hull sections or any other components, a specific tempering bead technique was used to do just that... ;) Control the potential for tempering embrittlement which is not good to have with this metal when a submarine hull is subjected to such tremendous pressures as it dives further than let's say 800 feet or more... Btw, it didn't matter which process was being used to weld the HY-80.

Respectfully,
Henry
Parent - - By Geese_howard (*) Date 06-24-2008 02:44
Well, going to the bases of temper embrittlement phenomena, any "susceptible steel", may get embrittled in zones of the HAZ exposed
to temperatures between roughly 300 - 550°C, or zones exposed to higher temperatures but very slowly cooled in that temperature range.
as long the microstructure of the base metal is tempered martensite (as in this case).

So, i think temper embrittlement is much more a concern in weldings subjected to PWHT, when careful consideration of the PWHTtemperature
and cooling procedures must be given. In cases in which the weldment is not subjected to PWHT , as in HY-80, temper embrittlenment should not
be a a problem, especially if P, Mn and Sn are low (temper embrittlement susceptibility is evaluated by the Watanabe factor J=(Si+Mn)(P+Sn)x10^4, in
this case Mn, P and Sn are low), since the time at 300-550°C in the HAZ is short. If fact, a tempering bead technique can be detrimental since
the time at temper embrittlement range can be actually increased in some zones of the HAZ. Since temper embrittlement can be reversed by exposure
to temperatures higher than 550°C, i recognize that theoretically, also can be beneficial, but i think is somehow not very controllable.

Tempering bead main function, is to reduce hardness of the HAZ, (especially to the zones subjected to full austenizing temperatures), generated by the previous bead, so the untempered martensite formed, get tempered and less prone to "cold cracking". In case of HY-80, the combination of preheat and heat input, are selected to get a very thin (by the low heat input, and low interpass temperature), and no so hard and stressed (by means of the minimum preheat) hardened HAZ. With this conditions, combined with the low carbon, the untempered martensite in the HAZ of the HY80 is "acceptable".

Anyway, i don't doubt at all about the experience of the engineers and welders from your company, so it would be very interesting for me if you can
outline the specific tempered bead technique you mention.

Best regards
Parent - - By ssbn727 (*****) Date 06-24-2008 11:51
So Geese!

What type of security clearance do you have???

First of all, anyone who has worked extensively with HY-80 would know some of the tempering bead techniques used  by NAVSEA/NAVSHIPS but, if you think I'm just going to freely share them with you without knowing "adam" about you, then I have a tunnel for sale in NYC for sale real cheap!!! :) :) :)

Another point about temper embrittlement is when we're talking about submarines... Where are you going to find a furnace big enough to fit an entire submarine in order to reverse the temper embrittlement in the first place???

You obviously haven't worked with HY-80 enough to know that what you mentioned in your response only makes sense in theory only, and only if you had access to the actual chemical compositions used by the USN for use on SSN's and SSBN's... Since you are obviously unfamiliar with the application of the tempering bead techniques used at EB, I would suspect that your actual experience with HY-80 is somewhat limited!!! So, my answer to you is: "Hell NO!!!" I will not share with you EB's application of the tempering bead techniques!!! Btw, if constant supervision is the norm, the application of the tempering bead is indeed very controllable!!! The late Rear Admiral Hyman Rickover made darn sure of that!!!

Respectfully,
Henry
Parent - By 803056 (*****) Date 06-24-2008 13:13
Great photos Henry.

Best regards - Al
Parent - - By Geese_howard (*) Date 06-24-2008 17:09
Well, i was not actually questioning the use of temper bead technique, i just was saying that prevent temper embrittlement is not
its real function, but to reduce the brittleness of untempered martensite in the HAZ of the first layers. (those are two very different phenomenoes)
I don't understand your statement about the big furnace, i was saying just the opposite, there is no need to reverse temper embrittlement
because is very unlikely to get it in the first place in a normal welding process thermal cycle!!. (anyway u actually can do a heat treatment to the parts of the submarine u want with resistence heaters, no need for big furnace ;) ). HY80 is actually more prone to reheat cracking than temper embrittlement . Maybe u was referring to that?.

Btw, if something is true in theory, it is in practice. If is not, theory is wrong or practice is bad. (Ethernal struggle between stubborn welders and engineers).

I actually have experience in HY-80, not that much but enough, don't worry about that. (Including german, british and american HY80 plates ... german is best by the way ... by far, sorry to the american friends... )

Its ok if u can't share the specific technique your company use, but in this these days secretisms about welding procedures are not very logical, everything is published and public sooner than later, but i understand your concerns, nobody wants to risks their jobs. It could have been interesting for the audience thought.

Respectfully also,
Parent - By ssbn727 (*****) Date 07-06-2008 06:46 Edited 07-06-2008 06:51
Enjoy!!!

http://www.ommi.co.uk/PDF/Articles/66.pdf

I'm referring to military grade HY-80 as opposed to commercial grade which is a very different chemical composition...

Oh and btw, the article has a slightly different take on how the tempering bead technique is applied when welding US submarine components yet, it's the best I could come up with for the time being without revealing too much - Capeche or as they pronounce it in NYC: "Capish??????" ;) ;) ;)

Anywho, enjoy the article.;)

Respectfully,
Henry
Up Topic Welding Industry / Technical Discussions / Differnece between HY form 80 steel and ASTM A656 gr80 steel

Powered by mwForum 2.29.2 © 1999-2013 Markus Wichitill