By 3.1 Inspector
Date 08-19-2008 19:08
I am fully aware of the limitations....
I know there was bait for me, put by CWI666 - and yes I took it(on purpose)
I hold on to my statement that PT is not the right option for CS (and other magnetic materials for that matter)
I dont know why you guys wont admit that, yes I know that each methos has its limitations - also MT.
I know I stated it as an absolute, part of it is because of me being not english speaking and therefore not always make myself clear, not that I want to use that as an excuse, I still hold on to my initial post's stating that PT is the wrong method for CS (in particular in this case)
In this particular thread it was a PQR test that were in question - not a small bore pipe somewhere in a circuit and a hard to reach place - in that case a PT test is the WRONG method.....
MT does go slightly sub-surface, which makes it a much better test, beside if you grind on the surface and then do a PT, the grinding might cover some small defects....And that gentlemen IS NOT OPEN TO DEBATE.....its a well proven fact!!!!
Your comment about RT on sockolets just prove my point.....
As the Inspector I can test anyway I choose, and if I see LOF, LOP, etc.... I dont need a code reference, I need my common sense and I need to interpret what I see on the image.....
:)
I am to lazy to reply to all of you!
By 3.1 Inspector
Date 08-19-2008 20:09
You are right, I was wrong on the PQR matter.....
CWI555,
Talk about hitting the nail on the head.
"It is obvious the Bias and hatred towards America overrides knowledge and integrity in his particular case."
He has an underlying agenda. Too bad, so sad. Life goes on. Let him woller in his own pile of ignorance, because as they say, "Ignorance is bliss" LOL
jrw159