Hmmmmm...
excellent information, Al!
And again I've learned something new!
If I understand this correctly, we are now back at Jeff's recommendation saying:
Quote: "Contact pyrometers are a better tool. They are not subject to infrared error, and they are verifiable." Unquote. ?
This under the recommendation that these "contact pyrometers" have no particular restrictions or drawbacks depending to material surface to be measured, or to the particular operator using the thermometer?
Or in other words: They are more "universal" and simpler in use?
If so, are they also "cheaper" compared to an infrared thermometer?
Thanks and best regards,
Stephan