NR 211 in a LN25 on SA200
YES it will work on any DC pwer source! However, the pure DC of SA 200's are the least forgiving. Rectified and inverters are far more user friendlyMake sure you have the correct Polarity, flip the internal switch in the LN25 to CC. What i used to do was use my regular dual purpose gun, remove the copper gas nozzle and put on the white FCAW insulator and then wrap the gas ports in some insulation cloth and hi-temp mastic (sorry, I'm a poor feller/cheapskate and did not want to buy another gun).
Here in lies the problem...
With out a CV module on the power source, the LN25 "cheats" for you with that internal switch. BUT !!! The stick out must be maintained once you find that "magic length".
Depending on which "gear" you set the selector on SA 200 is going to affect the electrical stick-out of the wire. Once you change any setting on either the suitcase or power source, it WILL affect the stick-out length AND usually by only a few thousandths of an inch.
Due to the length/size of job, dexterity involved and your ability to maintain that stick-out (tight spots), you might want to buy the module. This system I described works great on flat, easy access. When you get in a bind is when the whole Kit and Kaboodle will go south on you.
A small multi-purpose TrailBlazer or Ranger might be something to consider.
Without the module, all the inherent problems of wire feed welding will be compounded by that stick-out issue.
If you show up to a structural job in Cali with no 232 papers, you'll probably be welding handrails. I agree about running it CC, it's a b*****d to run CV in perfect conditions. We used to designate certain LN-25's just to run it so the settings would remain somewhat constant, especially the wire tension. Once you run a couple hundred pounds it gets better. I still think they should improve on it, it could be an awesome wire with some adjustments. I don't know about 211 being classified as non-structural because we welded moments with 232 and galvo and tube steel with 202. I had an engineer prequalify it to weld some heavy tube with it a few years ago, but I ended up using 232 instead. The tube steel was to support window washing equip from the top of a mulitstory bldg. Job was so critical the inspector had to witness all the welding at critical points. Funny thing was, the LN-25 crapped out on me when the inspector showed up and I ended up using 5/32 7018. So much for planning.
JohnJohn