Bryon,
Huh?
A woman who became a successful governor of a state, who ran for the second highest office in the country, who has garnered such unprecendented opposition and venom from the left is trivial? OK. Then would it be safe to say that you vehemently disagree with all of your politically active cohorts that have spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours attacking such a trivial person? And that then you have to admit they are wasting their time and money? If she is trivial then what threat could she possibly be?
I am not sure you understand the meanng of the word.

And I would certainly love to hear your explanation of how Alaska is somehow more backwoods than say Georgia or Arkansas?
Could she be more backwoods than Peanut Jimmy or the Hatfields, er, McCoys, er, Clintons?
Come on, its not backwoods that bothers you either.

As for the oil game thing. That is just too cliche'.
I wait to hear your explanation of how the 'oil game' is somehow more insidious than say that bastion of social concern GE that supported Schicklgruber with millions, and still supports him with iron fisted advocacy through their subsidiaries NBC and MSNBC.
Somehow the intent of the 'oil game' is worse than brainwashing unilateral control of the airwaves?
Do you realize that the average donation to Schicklgruber was well in excess of the average donation to McCain indicating that big money was in reality supporting the Democrat?
And that urban environment gave us the corrupt Chicago political machine. I can see where you would prefer that.

Dude,,

You can't blather on and on for endless months about a person and then in a single line pronounce that she is "trivial" and expect anybody with a brain to believe you.

Thou doth protest too much methinks!

"one more backwoods conservative"
"We need to keep presidents from the reality of an urban environment "

Well now that is very interesting. I have some questions for you bryon.

When's the last time you witnessed farms in an urban environment that could feed a 1/3rd of the planet?
Percentage wise, how much of the U.S. energy generation capacity is in areas that are considered urban such as Chicago, Atlanta, L.A. etc?
Do you drive a car? and if so does it use gas?
For that matter, do you eat?
How about drink water?
Do you understand where the supplies that make a city and sustain a city come from?
You claim to own guns, what do you think is going to happen to them when one more liberal gets into office?

Most importantly, If tomorrow, everything and anything that came out of the "backwoods" were suddenly cut off, how long do you think your going to survive in that "urban environment"?

You've made the insinuation that every conservative backwoods person is ignorant and incapable of leadership.
I've got a news flash for you bryon, you better start wondering if your going to survive in that urban environment without food, water, gas, or electricity. The backwoods folks are an unassuming lot and usually even keeled, but they have not forgotten where those basic supplies come from and they are fast getting to the point of no return angry with a system that attempts to trivialize them as your post evidences. I can promise you they have a much better understand of what it takes to make a country survive and thrive than any arrogant liberal urbanite.

So who is better fit to run a country? I'll take that backwoods common sense over urbanite arrogance and ignorance any day of the week.