Like a commie .......
Answer the question, but don’t give the one I don’t like.

Tell me Bry how many lights do you see?

I see where all these wars made us a bunch of money, that’s right Iraq was all about money.
with  a mere 20 billion a month you too can reap the benefits of war and loose friends and family.......man the money is flowing in can ya feel it.
just wait until big o gets going in Afghanistan we will all be rich!

You made me LOL.  And then I LOLed some more. :)

Seriously, the British?  Intervention?  Do you have any idea why Canada's flag has a little bit o' the Union Jack in her?  Bryon, I do believe you have reached your final straw.  Ask a few Indians (not the native American types) and Middle Easteners about how protective the Brits were of indigenous peoples during the good ol' days.

"What is the bill that Clinton signed?"
Never said it was a bill.
http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/hotproperty/archives/2008/02/clintons_drive.html

As for being called a commie, If the shoe fits wear it. You post che's picture up, agree with castro, and try to be an idiot posting the Karl Marx manifesto up in ISBN reference form, then call yourself brilliant. Most "logical" people can draw the inference that you agree with communist principles, which by default, makes you commie. Don't be whining when people call you what you paint yourself to be.

Attacks on people's intelligence and honor are just as personal to most, (especially those who have worn a uniform in the name of their country).

Let us not forget where the liberals got their ideals from

Alinsky, "Rules for Radicals"
RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating.

Yes I've read it byron, the whole book, and hundreds of others along it's vein.
You play rule number 5 out constantly. Deliberately jab to piss people off by ridiculing them, and by this rule

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

I could go on, buy your conversations are tic for tac with those 'rules' alinsky put down. You pick someone out like Henry who has a strong sense of pride and honor, who you think you can get a rise out of. you attempt to freeze the conversation around a specific point, you personalize by using rule 5, and then you polorize it by drawing in others to the point where you stand back and cry oh see... see... see.. how these people beat up on poor defenseless me?
example:
"Should I just sit back and agree with all the crap that others spew on here?  Or state my opinion?  I can just forget about everyone thats not a WASP roll over and die like many here have."
'crap that others spew on here'. In that one statement you dismiss any and all value of any statement others have made.

No byron, it doesn't work on me. You can tell Sauls ghost thanks but no thanks.

In truth, I am beginning to doubt you have an original idea in your head. Every single political belief you espouse seems to be rooted in someone elses beliefs.
It's enough to make me think you've been in a circle of people who believe everything you espouse here so long that you now believe it without a single shred of evidence or self reliance on fact checking.

I did not come by my beliefs through listening to others. Religiously, I studied taoism, buddism, islam, confusionism, athiesm, judaism, bahai, sakhism, nichochirin buddism, didanvwisgi, and others. I settled on a personal view of Christianity after some eye opening events in my life.

Politically I've studied about anything you can name, and still study to this day.

Current events I look a lot further into the history and events than most until I am personallys satisfied of it's veracity.

Scientifically, my post from the past will speak for themselves.

Work and career, the same as science.

I've witnessed a lot of the folks you ridicule display uncommonly high intelligence. Yet you fail to see it. You are blinded by your own arrogance.
After all the crap that has been directed your way, after all the differences of opinion with the vaste majority of this forum, have you ever considered that just maybe it's you that are wrong????
It's like the man standing in a room with his hair on fire pointing at 100 other people and telling them they are responsible for the smoke in the room.

Good for you!

You know what they say about opinions don't you? Everybody's got one!!! I'm sick and tired of all of this political correctness crap that's being shoved down my throat, so if you don't mind shove it down your own throat this time because I'm not swallowing - CAPECHE??? And if NOT TOO FRIGGIN BAD!!!

I remember not too long ago, I too was trying my best to be politically correct, but I realized I couldn't feel comfortable at all being literally put on a proverbial muzzle whenever it suited some group of the population, or place of interest, or even something that was maybe marginally sacred!!! It got to the point that I couldn't express myself at all in the way I really with comfortable in doing so...

So if I offended someone who is an intellectually handicapped individual then I  might think twice and apologize if it offended you, but, it was not meant in that manner, so I'm not going to apologize at all!!! It was meant at someone who are themselves posing as intellectually superior individuals that are acting like total dumb asses and in a joking manner remind me of someone that's RETARDED!!! :) :) :) Whoops!!! I said it again!!! So sue me dog gone it!!!

If you really want to know how I feel about you comments??? I respectfully disagree with you, and I'm tired of all this political correctness for cryin out loud already and I'm standing my ground - PERIOD!!!

P.S. Your comment about not believing that all Blacks are the "N" word that you clearly used even though you substituted the letters "g"  with stars indicates in a very obvious manner that you too dropped the proverbial ball with the your statement by the virtue of saying that "Not all" which does infer that some are indeed the "N' word that you obviously alluded to, so please do not pontificate, or patronize to me something that you cannot practice as well - I rest my case!!! Btw, Retard is used in scientific as well as technical publications as opposed to the "N' word which is not at all, so IMHO, it's not as equally offensive if used in the manner I chose to.

Respectfully,
Henry