![](/mwf/attachments//avatars/3040-3756.png)
First off "WELDCOME TO THE WORLD'S GREATEST WELDING FORUM!!! :) :) :)" Since this is your first of hopefully many posts in here, I would like to say that the person who drew the drawing has caused all of the confusion you're experiencing here... The entire intent of the drawing is incorrect!!! Please let me elaborate if I may...
First off, the view that has the welding symbol pointing toward is is incorrect because it uses two sets of object lines to represent the bends shown on that piece of plate in what is either the side or the front view which would make more sense because after all it does represent the best overal shape of what the part is supposed to look like when assembled together... Instead of those two object lines, there should be one object line then one hidden line where each bend is represented in the view with the welding symbol... So that where the confusion begins and once again, it's probably the fault of someone inexperienced enough to make correct drawings in the first place! My friend Al can give you many, many war stories which had all different types of mistakes on the drawings that it was a miracle that anything at all was completed in a timely manner, and I've seen my own fair share of clusterfu@ks as well.. So that where the problem originates...
The welding symbol is a fillet weld deposit on both sides of the arrow (Meaning Both on the arrow side, or near side as well as the other, or far side even though "near and far" are no longer standard AWS nomenclature.). The problem with this fillet weld both sides welding symbol is the fact that there is no size dimension listed anywhere in the welding symbol, and for material such Ti 6Al 4V there should definitely be a specific size listed especially for the thickness being used...
So what I would do if I were you is to go to the person who drew this drawing and confirm that this person meant to draw hidden lines where there is a solid object line instead @ the two locations in the drawing where the welding symbols is pointing at... And then ask what size fillet leg size do they want to be deposited especially when working with the thickness of .060, and also ask if they want the weld to be continuous, or intermittent, and if they want intermittent deposits, ask them if they want them staggered or not and what the size of each weld deposit length would be, and also the Center to Center spacing and/or pitch would be for each deposit and, the specific start and stop locations throughout both sides of the joint so that you can properly lay out the welds and dimension them accordingly to their appropriate locations as per design! No disrespect, but I don't agree with your interpretation FWIW. ;)
But it's not your fault after all, it's the clumsiness of the person who drew the drawing whom I wouldn't call a competent, or experienced with many different types of welding symbols, and joint configurations type of drafter because then this person would have gone out of their way express all of the details I mentioned that are obviously missing in the drawing in it's present form. :) So get in touch with the decision makers, and ask the diplomatically, so as not to blatantly damage their overly sensitive egos regarding the details I pointed out to you, and work with them to resolve the issues you need to clarify so that you can intelligently produce this part in the way it was meant to be produced - CAPECHE??? :) :) :)
Respectfully,
Henry