By -
Date 04-14-2005 15:57
Jerry,
I definitely agree with you that the statement "...whichever is applicable" at both 6.14.4 and 6.14.5 is confusing and unnecessary. That statement should be removed from both of those paragraphs, and if you read it that way, it becomes clearer.
In fact, if you look at ASTM E709, ASTM E165, and ASTM E1444, they all provide only technique requirements/practices for MT or PT. They do not provide acceptance criteria. They all refer you to use the governing standard for acceptance criteria (for instance in E1444 this is stated in paragraph5.1). In the case of the governing standard AWS D1.1, the acceptance criteria are found in Section 6, Part C.
As stated in my previous post, and indeed as stated in D1.1 paragraph 6.10 ("welds that are subject to MT and PT, in addition to visual inspection, shall be evaluated on the basis of the applicable requirements for visual inspection"), the MT and PT criteria in D1.1 are not written specifically as MT and PT acceptance criteria, as you will find in many other codes that refer to linear and rounded indications. In D1.1, the "applicable" VT criteria are to be used. Some of the VT criteria are not applicable to MT or PT, such as weld profile, weld size, etc.
Mankenberg