Not logged inAmerican Welding Society Forum
Forum AWS Website Help Search Login
Up Topic Welding Industry / Technical Discussions / P No. and S No. ?
- - By siva78siva Date 11-05-2007 07:19
Please explain what is meant by P and S nos? What it means P1,P2,P3,P4,P5A,P5B,P8,P6,P7,P8. PLEASE HELP ME URGENT...

regards,
Siva..
Parent - - By Stephan (***) Date 11-05-2007 07:31 Edited 11-05-2007 07:35
siva78siva,

perhaps having a look upon:

http://www.aws.org/cgi-bin/mwf/topic_show.pl?pid=70643#pid70643 ?

or eventually:

http://www.aws.org/cgi-bin/mwf/topic_show.pl?pid=23492#pid23492 ?

Doing a search in the forums helps...

Regards,
Stephan
Parent - - By 803056 (*****) Date 11-05-2007 23:12
Simplified, P numbers and S numbers are groupings of base metals with similar weldability and chemistries to reduce the number of procedures that have to be run.

P1/S1 - carbon steel
P5/S5 - high strength low alloy steel
P8/S8 austenitic stainless steel
P21, 22, 23, and 24 - aluminum and its alloys
P3X - copper and copper alloys
P4X - nickel and nickel alloys
P5X - titanium and titanium alloys
P6X - zirconium and its alloys

The base metal specifications that are grouped as P numbers are approved for pressure retaining welds.
The base metal specifications that are grouped as S numbers are not approved for pressure retaining welds, but in some case can be used in some piping systems.

A procedure qualified with a base metal that is a P numbered specification can be used to weld base metals in the same S numbered group.
A procedure qualified with a base metal that is a S numbered specification can not be used to weld a base metal meeting a specification in a similar P numbered group.

Hope this is what you were looking for. However, never, never forget what the letters ASME stand for; Always, Sometimes, Maybe, and Except!!!!!!!!!!

Best regards - Al
Parent - By Stephan (***) Date 11-06-2007 06:49
Terrific Al!

Although I wasn't the one who has initiated this thread please allow me to say as well "Thank you!".

Very clear and understandable.

Al = Read = Learn :-)

Best regards,
Stephan

P.S. You wouldn't believe how long I was searching for the description of what ASME stands for... ;-)

Parent - - By Fredspoppy (**) Date 11-07-2007 14:26
Al,
Just a comment on whether or not P/S numbered materials are approved for pressure retaining welds, or not.  I have included an excerpt from Section IX that describes the difference between P and S.  There are no references (that I know of) in fabrication codes, i.e. B31.3, Section VIII, etc., that prohibit using S number materials for pressure retaining weldings.  The S designates materials that are not included in ASME Section II.  Your comments on qualifications using P and S number materials are exactly correct.
Parent - - By 803056 (*****) Date 11-07-2007 17:47
I stand by the last sentence in my response. ;)

Al
Parent - - By CWI555 (*****) Date 11-14-2007 23:49
AMEN!
Parent - By js55 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 14:54
This is interesting. I think it all comes down to whether or not the material is listed in Table A-1 or not. If not it has no allowable stress values to apply.
Parent - - By 803056 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 16:41
Hello Fred;

I don't claim to be an expert on each of the ASME construction codes, but I thought there were differences between the piping codes and Section VIII as to when the S classified materials could be used for pressure retaining components. The other big difference occurs when qualifying the WPS and the range of materials that are included when the procedure is qualified. I seem to remember a situation where the piping provided by a supplier was an A53 and was considered to be a S numbered material where as the material ordered was SA53. The substitution was not permitted because one was a S number and the other (as required) a P numbered materials. It all gets so hazy after a while.

The fact I recognize my limitations of intellect is why I always go back to the construction code the verify the requirements before I start the work. It's one thing to shoot from the hip when I reply to a thread, but it's another when it actually comes to putting the arc on the metal. I never trust my memory. My brain squeaks when I think, so I try to minimize that by keeping the appropriate code sections close at hand. The pages are well worn!:)

Best regards - Al
Parent - - By jon20013 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 16:43
Al, in my opinion, your's is the response of one whom I would TRULY consider an EXPERT!!!!!
Parent - - By 803056 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 16:55
Thanks for the unearned complement.

I read your responses closely whenever I see one. I know I can "take it to the Bank" when you give your opinions on matters such as ASME and issues regarding welding.

By the way, I had the pleasure of meeting with and going to dinner with Stephan! He is truly an amazing individual. I also met with Lawrence. He didn't get to go to dinner with Stephan and me, but the three of us spent the afternoon together and had a great time. Don't let Lawrence fool anyone with his low keyed manner. This is one fellow member that is going to do great things for the AWS. He was "serving " time in the AWS Education booth the last time I saw him at the FabTech show. He is a dedicated fellow that is recognized for his hard work on AWS committees.

We need to learn to the secrets of teletransportation from the StarTrek scientists. I was never a follower of the show, but there is a need for their technology. I would like nothing better than to get together with the folks that are regulars in this forum and meet face to face and discuss welding issues.

Best regards - Al
Parent - - By js55 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 17:08
I do believe some clarifying quote needs to be provided here.
When I look at Table A-1 in B31.3 I see A53 with Allowable Stresses listed so I don't understand why A53 would not be allowed.
Parent - - By js55 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 17:12
B31.3
323.1.2
Unlisted materials may be used provided they conform to a published specification covering chemistry, physical and mechanical properties, method and process of manufacture, heat treatment, and quality control, and otherwise meet the requirments of this Code. Allowable stresses shall be determined in accordance with the applicable allowable stress basis of this Code or a more conservative basis."
Parent - By js55 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 17:14
The only prohibition I see is para. 323.1.3
"Materials of unkown specification shall not be used for pressure-containing piping components."
Parent - - By 803056 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 17:42 Edited 11-15-2007 17:51
The discrepancy is the specifics of the appropriate construction code.

Depending on the construction code, an ASTM material is not permitted to be simply substituted for an ASTM material, i.e., ASTM A53 may be classified as a S1 numbered material while a ASME SA53 is classified as a P1 material.

I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that only those materials classified as SA or SB materials (ASME approved ASTM materials) could be used in the construction of a boiler under Section I. This is not the case with external piping where the applicable construction code B31.1 allows a flange classified as an ASTM A105 to be substituted for a ASME SA105. I believe all ASME code sections allow SA/SB materials to be substituted for ASTM A or B material specifications (A being ferrous and B being nonferrous materials), but not the reverse in all cases (again, code section specific).

I am at a disadvantage, so you can help me here, I don't have a full set of section II (parts A, B, C, and D). I was under the impression only ASME SA or SB materials were listed with a P number assignment. I was also under the impression that ASTM materials were assigned S numbers. If both are listed in Section II, Part A, does the list discriminated between P numbers assigned to ASME listed base metal specifications for base metals and S numbers assigned to ASTM specification por base metals?

Someone said, "You have to be a lawyer to read the code." I sometimes have to agree with the statement because unless we know all the specifics, the appropriate code sections as well as the proposed materials, we can only address generalities.  One must always remember what the letters A, S, M, and E stand for. Without knowing all the specifics, we can only talk in general terms.

Best regards - Al
Parent - - By chall (***) Date 11-15-2007 19:56
I'm really pressed for time and don't have enough to digest this entire thread right now; but one thing catches my eye (and maybe this is what you intended):

B31.1, 123.2.2 - Boiler External Piping:

Mtls for BEP, as defined in 100.1.2(A), shall be specified in accordance with ASME SA, SB of SFA specifications.  Mtl produced under ASTM spec. may be used, provided that the req'ts of the ASTM spec. are identical or more stringent than the ASME spec. for the Grade, Class or Type produced.

There is more, but this is very important.  I have caught myself (or been caught by our AI) assuming that since the material was listed in Appendix A, it could automatically be used in any B31.1 application.  It's not true when the application is Boiler External Piping.

Charles
Parent - By 803056 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 20:09
See, I knew someone, in this case Charles, with more current experience and knowledge would come to the rescue.

Thanks for the clarification Charles.

Best regards - Al
Parent - - By jon20013 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 17:41
Thanks Al!  I also appreciate the unearned compliment!  Probably like yourself, I fully realize I am wrong probably as often as I'm write!  I guess that's why sometimes the posts in the Forum seem so extended but it's nice having other "highly knowledgable" folks such as yourself, js55, John Write, Stephan and the list goes on and on and on... to bounce our questions and ideas from. 

Although I've never met Stephan personally, he did e-mail me and mention your meeting with him and Lawrence... all 3 of you are pretty amazing folks and I always pay very close attention to all 3 of your postings!  One of these day's I'll be with an employer where I am able to get time off to enjoy, mix and mingle, it's been a lot of years since I've been able to do so and am shortly headed for an overseas assignment so.... who knows????

Wishing you all a very good day!
Parent - - By js55 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 17:56
Al,
Its been too long since I've done Section I stuff, and my graying beard and receding hairline should speak volumes about my ability to recall anything beyond my oatmeal this morning (or was it donuts), so I can't address that. Perhaps some of our boiler guys can step in. I do happen to have a B31.3 (2002) available which is what I quoted from.
Parent - By 803056 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 19:00
I hope so.

It is hard to answer ASME questions properly without all the information and all the references. All too often the individual doesn't provide all the information we need to answer the question completely. In some cases it may be because they don't have the information to give us.

I just hope the answers I give don't lead the person in the wrong direction. At best, I stumble with what they do provide and limit my response to my recollection and those limited resources I have at the time of the response.

So, I hope someone with better information and more experience joins in with their brain power to enlighten me so I can learn more about the intricacies of ASME.

By the way, how are you?

I had a great time at FabTech. Ran into a lot of old friends. Saw my friends Ken Coryell, Dick Holdren, and Kip Mankenburg that many of you know. I also met up with Lawrence and Stephan who you all know from the forum.  I also met a great fellow from Istanbul, Turkey. We both had dinner as an invited guest of Stephan. What a meal! I would be twice my size if I ate like that all the time.

I was really impressed by Chicago. This was my first time in Chicago (I can't count the time spent at the airport as time in Chicago). I must have walked three miles each evening after spending time walking the show floor just to look at the buildings. I was impressed by the architecture and the magnificence of the buildings. I had the urge to strap on my tool belt and join the gang of ironworkers working with a stiffleg derrick to raise iron on the roof of the building right across the street from my hotel. Old habits died hard and once an ironworker, you never lose the urge to be part of the gang.

Sorry to bend your ear, but its good to be back!

Best regards - Al
Parent - By 803056 (*****) Date 11-15-2007 18:37
I don't envy you and the traveling.

I try to limit my travel to a week per month. There are months where I don't have to travel, but I have to pay for my "sins" by traveling for several weeks back to back. This is one of those times. I am traveling for four of the six weeks. I just finished three weeks of travel and I'm glad to be home with my grand children. I got home at 1:30 AM this morning and already one was over to assemble a new Lego kit with grandpa. We didn't finish, so he was upset that he had to stop to go to school.

My practice gives me the flexibility I need to go to AWS committees, the Show, and my other activities. While I have that flexibility, I also don't have an employer footing the bills for the travel, hotels, and meals, not to mention the $1800/month I pay just for medical insurance. There are trade-offs to being self-employed or working for a corporation.

I've worked for "Corporate America" and I've had some darn good positions, but never fit into the corporate culture very well, a case of a square peg in a round hole.

If someone asks "Are there any questions?", I'm going to ask my questions.

If someone asks, "Is there anyone that doesn't believe we'll hit the delivery date?", I'm going to give my honest opinion.

It goes back to my days as a welder, "Don't ask the question if you don't want to hear the answer."

"Dear does this dress make my butt look big?"

"You betcha." Loved that commercial. I don't know why but my wife always gives me a side-ward glance when that one comes on the TV.

That attitude doesn't always sit well with the person asking the question. I guess that explains why I wasn't asked to be a member of Bush's cabinet.

I give you and others like you that take these extended assignments credit. I only hope that you are being well compensated for your time away from the "Good Old US of A" and your loved ones.

I found travel to be easier while I was younger and I didn't have grandchildren. As I tell my wife, "I may not die rich, but I'm going to die happy." She definitely agrees with the "rich" part.

I hate to ramble. It isn't like I don't have work to do after being out of the office for the last three weeks, but I have to tell you a story. I took a course titled "The Future of Communications". It was my first introduction (as well as everyone in the class) to the Internet. He took us to the computer lab and instructed us how to access the Internet and we were all given accounts and screen names. Of course all the women in the group were the first to locate the porn sites (go figure). He told us that within five years we would wonder how we ever got along without the Internet. He went on to talk about how we would communicate and how we would come to depend on the Internet. At the end of the course we had to turn in "course evaluations" of the course and the instructor. One other fellow and I gave the instructor and course a favorable evaluation. The university fired him. As it turns out, everything he told us was spot on the mark. Every time I use my computer to send a file I think of that individual and how he was ahead of the curve and how it cost him his position at the university. The lesson learned was that everyone has something to contribute to our society. Just because I can't see what's on the horizon, doesn't mean that someone else with a higher vantage point can't see it. It is to our advantage to learn who those individuals are sitting in those higher vantage points and to listen to them when they have something to say. We might see the future.

You have a different vantage point that I do. I read to your comments very closely. I do learn something new each time.  Good luck on your new assignment and I hope that doesn't mean you will be out of touch with your family of forum regulars. There are several people that participate in this forum that we have come to rely upon. You are in that unique class of people. Your responses are factual, accurate, and helpful. That's why I visit this site as often as I do. That's why Chuck will be missed. He  too was a member of the elite. I'm sure he was the same in his day to day contact with family and friends. We may never meet face to face, but we are building relationships and friendships through our keyboards.  

Best regards - Al
Up Topic Welding Industry / Technical Discussions / P No. and S No. ?

Powered by mwForum 2.29.2 © 1999-2013 Markus Wichitill