Not logged inAmerican Welding Society Forum
Forum AWS Website Help Search Login
Up Topic Welding Industry / Technical Discussions / Backing per D1.1 section 5.10.2
- - By NormanE Date 01-30-2008 22:38
What if there is an established history of using backing in a 5G (pipe to flange) where the backing was not CJP at the butt joint of the backing material and it still passed UT. And by history I mean 20 to 30 years of history, with no in-field failures.

Would a PQR,WPS, and a documented test coupon specifying this situation be required to avoid outside inpsection rejecting the part?
Parent - By hogan (****) Date 01-30-2008 22:56
i think that it would need the approval of the engineer. in d1.1 anything is possible, as long as the EOR stamps it.
Parent - - By CWI555 (*****) Date 01-31-2008 00:45
Had posted before, but trying to find a more PC way of saying it.

Better get the EOR to sign off on this based on history. I don't see how they "passed" UT legitimately to begin with. It would be ill advised to use that as your reasoning for getting an "outside" agency to buy off on it.

Regards,
Gerald
Parent - By swnorris (****) Date 01-31-2008 14:13
I agree with Hogan and Gerald.  The EOR is ultimately responsible.
Up Topic Welding Industry / Technical Discussions / Backing per D1.1 section 5.10.2

Powered by mwForum 2.29.2 © 1999-2013 Markus Wichitill