Not to hijack the thread, but ASME sells their codes in the electronic and hard print format. They will not accept the electronic format or a printed copy during a code audit if the contractor is seeking a code stamp. Yet, if memory serves me, you are allowed to print a single copy from the electronic file.
Personally, I have no problem with a contractor that elects to purchase an AWS standard in the electronic format and then prints a file copy for use in their office or on the shop floor. The only time it makes a difference to me is if someone shows up for the CWI examination with a photocopied reproduction of the structural welding code. That is not permitted by AWS. Other than that, what adults do behind closed doors is their business, not mine. I am not employed by the Copyright Police force and I am under no contractual obligation to inform AWS of the activities of a contractor.
If I were to audit a contractor seeking certification as a Certified Fabricator program, then I would be under contract by AWS and I would obligated to raise red flag if I were to discover a photocopied copy of the structural code lying about. In other words, it the copy wasn't in plain view, how would I know that there was one or more photocopied versions of the code being used? The question boils down to one of morality and ethics.
Considering the cost of the AWS and ASME codes, I can hardly fault an inspector that elected to take a photocopy of the code into the field where there is a high probability it will be damaged. I am currently on my third purchased copy of AWS D1.1:2010. I do not have any photocopies, but I would not throw stones at anyone that used a photocopied copy in the field. That is a different situation than running off twenty copies of the code and distributing them to everyone that wants one.
Just my opinion the subject.
Best regards - Al