Another question to ask is, If Obama is the candidate of "Change We Need" as all the campaign posters carried so mindlessly by the liberal eloi say, then what change is it that he advocates that is so different from the same old rancid liberal progressivism that we've become so familiar with through Mondale, Leahy, Gore, Kerry, Dodd, Frank, H. Clinton, T. Kennedy (first intitial intended) and of course, Pelosi, and the liberal Chicago political machine? This guy is a product of one of the most corrupt political systems in the country, who's first election to State legislature was brought about by getting his opponents ejected from the process through a technicality, leaving him the only candidate on the ballot. Don't take my word for it. Look it up. If you dare.
So, come on. What's different? Is Chicago extremism really the "change we need"? Are you fricken kiddin me?